Medina v. Liakopoulos et al
Plaintiff: Miguel Medina
Defendant: Christopher Liakopoulos, City of Chicago and Ruben Reynoso
Case Number: 1:2022cv05043
Filed: September 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2022 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Vincent Michael Rizzo (Rizzo, Vincent)
October 19, 2022 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Miguel Medina. City of Chicago waiver sent on 9/20/2022, answer due 11/21/2022. (Kulis, Gregory)
September 20, 2022 Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED complaint by Miguel Medina against All Defendants (Kulis, Gregory)
September 20, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Miguel Medina by Vincenzo Bruno Caporale (Caporale, Vincenzo)
September 20, 2022 Filing 3 Attorney Lien by Miguel Medina (Kulis, Gregory)
September 20, 2022 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Miguel Medina by Gregory E. Kulis (Kulis, Gregory)
September 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Miguel Medina; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19848884. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kulis, Gregory)
September 16, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, )
September 16, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medina v. Liakopoulos et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miguel Medina
Represented By: Gregory E. Kulis
Represented By: Vincenzo Bruno Caporale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Liakopoulos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chicago
Represented By: Vincent Michael Rizzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruben Reynoso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?