Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company v. Madlin Haircuts Corp. et al
| Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company |
| Madlin Haircuts Corp., Madlin Bibla and Laith "Larry&quo Arkalious |
| 1:2022cv05084 |
| September 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Madlin Bibla, Madlin Haircuts Corp. (smb, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company by Michael John Duffy (Duffy, Michael) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Telephonic initial status hearing set for 11/29/2022 at 9:00 AM. To ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to listen to telephonic hearings. The call-in number is (888) 557-8511 and the access code is 3547847. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (lma, ) |
| Filing 5 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company (Conaghan, Ashley) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company by Alan M. Posner (Posner, Alan) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company by Ashley L. Conaghan (Conaghan, Ashley) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Conaghan, Ashley) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19854437. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Conaghan, Ashley) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mbh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mbh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
