Watson v. Dart et al
| Kirk Watson |
| Thomas Dart, Cook County Jail System and Cook County |
| 1:2022cv05118 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $3.80 from his account for payment to the Clerk as an initial partial payment of the filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. Following initial review of Plaintiff's complaint #8 , the Court grant's Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 and requests that D'Anthony v. Thedford, Thedford Garber Law, 1932 South Halsted, Suite 506, Chicago, IL 60608, tony@thedfordgarberlaw.com, represent Plaintiff in accordance with counsel's trial bar obligations under the District Court's Local Rules 83.11(h) and 83.37.1 Plaintiff's complaint #8 , however, is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of an amended complaint by counsel, and summonses shall not issue. Instead, by December 7, 2022, counsel shall appear and file an amended complaint that comports with counsel's obligations under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to Plaintiff, the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration, attorney Thedford, the Systems and Fiscal Departments of the Northern District of Illinois, and the PACER Service Center at http://www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/register.html. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 11/7/2022. Mailed notice (nsf, )
|
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 11/7/22 #9 , to Plaintiff, recruited counsel, the Systems Department of the Northern District of Illinois, and the PACER Service Center. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Correction regarding #1 . (nsf, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Correction regarding #2 . (nsf, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to plaintiff. (nsf, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Kirk Watson for attorney representation. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kirk Watson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (nsf, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Kirk Watson. (nsf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
