Marshall v. Elgin Police Dept. et al
| Richard Marshall |
| Elgin Police Dept. and Det. Houghton |
| 1:2022cv05233 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 11/1/2022. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER : Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and terminate the case. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 11/1/2022. (See attached Order for further detail.) Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED complaint by Richard Marshall against Elgin Police Dept., Det. Houghton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(gcy, ) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Marshall; Jury Demand. (Attachments).(gcy, ) |
| MAILED copy of Order dated 10/7/22 to Richard Marshall with Blank Complaint form and I.F.P. Application. (gcy, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff Richard Marshall brings this pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendants Elgin Police Department and Detective Houghton. Dkt. 1. Before the court is Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). For the reasons explained herein, Plaintiff's IFP application #4 is denied without prejudice. Further, upon initial review of Plaintiff's complaint, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has until October 31, 2022 to file an amended IFP application or pay the $402 filing fee. Plaintiff also has until October 31, 2022 to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to follow this order, this case will be dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to provide this order and a blank pro se complaint form and blank IFP application to the plaintiff. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 10/7/2022. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gcy, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Richard Marshall for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit.(gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Richard Marshall. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complain by Richard Marshall. (Exhibits). (gcy, ) Modified on 9/27/2022 (gcy, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
