Patton v. WalMart
| Shunta Patton |
| WalMart |
| 1:2022cv05286 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Shunta Patton. (kl, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #6 is granted. Pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3), service is to be made by the United States Marshal Service. The Clerk is directed to: (1) issue summons for service of the complaint on defendant; and (2) send plaintiff a blank form USM-285 (Marshals service form). Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 10/27/2022. Mailed notice. (kl, )
|
| SUMMONS Issued as to Plaintiff Shunta Patton (kl, ) |
| MAILED a blank form USM-285 (Marshals service form) to Shunta Patton. (kl, ) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Shunta Patton for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (jmk, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied. Plaintiff is granted 28 days in which either: (1) to pay the filing fee; or (2) to file a new, complete petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Otherwise, this case will be dismissed. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 10/5/2022. Mailed notice. (kl, )
|
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kl, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Shunta Patton (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Shunta Patton for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (kl, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (kl, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Shunta Patton (Attachments) (kl, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patton v. WalMart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shunta Patton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WalMart | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
