Nitetek Licensing LLC v. Aeris Communications, Inc.
| Nitetek Licensing LLC |
| Aeris Communications, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv05323 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 12/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Outline for the Initial Joint Status Report) (rao, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nitetek Licensing LLC by David Randolph Bennett (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nitetek Licensing LLC by Steven G Kalberg (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Nitetek Licensing LLC (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed by Nitetek Licensing LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19888423. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A United States Patent No. 6,661,783, #3 Exhibit B Claim Chart re Aeris Communications Neo)(Kalberg, Steven) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Aeris Communications, Inc. (smb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nitetek Licensing LLC v. Aeris Communications, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nitetek Licensing LLC | |
| Represented By: | David Randolph Bennett |
| Represented By: | Steven G Kalberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aeris Communications, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
