Williams v. Mort et al
| Terrence T. Williams |
| Joseph Mort, Jeffrey Dudek, Janette Shiperak, Joanna Sefah, Frederiksen, Alex Michalski, Thomas Hannigan, William Garner, Colin Wehr, Derek Coppes, Matthew Kasparek, Michael Zolecki, Leslie Jones, K. Wisenhunt, Tony Richards, Andrea Perry and M. Peyton |
| 1:2022cv05363 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (Envelope not Postmarked) (jh, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel In Forma Pauperis Application/Filing Fee Waiver" #8 is granted to the extent that the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff to submit his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis to 1/27/2023 and once again directs the Clerk to mail Plaintiff a blank application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. Failure to comply with the filing-fee requirements by the date set forth above will result in summary dismissal of this matter. Mailed notice (axc). |
| MAILED copy of Minute Entry #9 and a blank in forma pauperis application to Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams. (axc). |
| MAILED a blank in forma pauperis application and a copy of order #7 to Terrence Williams. (kl, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to compel In Forma Pauperis Application/Filing fee waiver filed by Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams. (Envelope Postmarked 12/12/2022) (jh, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to submit his in forma pauperis application #6 is granted to 12/22/2022. This is Plaintiff's second extension of time, an extension to 12/1/2022, having already been provided. Failure to satisfy the filing-fee requirements by the date set forth above will result in summary dismissal of this matter. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank in forma pauperis application and a copy of this order. Mailed notice (axc). |
| MAILED copy of Minute Entry #7 to Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams. (axc). |
| Filing 6 MOTION for In Forma Pauperis Application and Extension of Time to Fulfill by Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams. (Envelope postmarked 11/14/2022) (daj, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to submit an in forma pauperis application #4 is granted. The Court extends the deadline to 12/1/2022 for Plaintiff to either (1) pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee, or (2) seek leave to pay the filing fee in installments by submitting a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to satisfy the filing-fee requirement by 12/1/2022 will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank in forma pauperis application (prisoner version), and a copy of this order. Mailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams for application and extension of time to submit application. (Envelope postmarked 10/28/2022) (daj, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit without pre-paying the $402.00 filing fee or submitting an in forma pauperis application. If Plaintiff wants to pursue this lawsuit, he must, by November 10, 2022 either (1) pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee, or (2) seek leave to pay the filing fee in installments by submitting a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to fully comply with this order will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner version), along with a copy of this order. The Court defers screening of Plaintiff's complaint #1 until his filing-fee status is resolved. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 10/20/2022. Mailed notice (axc).
|
| MAILED copy of Order #3 to Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams. (axc). |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Terrence T. Williams. (jh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Terrence T. Williams. (Envelope not Postmarked) (jh, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
