Johnson v. Smith Jr. et al
| ONeal Johnson |
| Jonathan Smith Jr., Kyle Kruzel, Yasmine Laplanche, Justin Quaglia, Tyreon Davis, Kyler Smith, Sargent O'Donnell and City Of Chicago |
| 1:2022cv05405 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan B Gottschall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Any response to appearing defendants' motion #22 to stay this case pending related criminal proceedings in state court is due on or before December 2, 2022, after which date the court will rule promptly by mail. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 22 MOTION by Defendants City Of Chicago, Tyreon Davis, Kyle Kruzel, Yasmine Laplanche, Justin Quaglia, Kyler Smith, Jonathan Smith Jr. to stay Proceedings- OPPOSED (Bammel, Emily) |
| Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Yasmine Laplanche by Emily Rachel Bammel (Bammel, Emily) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Appearing defendants' unopposed motion #19 for an extension to and including 12/2/2022 of their deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is granted with the exception of the two defendants who have not appeared. Appearing defendants represent that defendants Laplanche-Dixon and O'Donnell have not been properly served with the summons and complaint. They therefore presently have no answer deadline to extend. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). As appearing defendants request, if defendants Laplanche-Dixon and O'Donnell are properly served before 11/11/2022, they will have until and including 12/2/2022 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. The deadline of 12/7/2022 to file a joint initial status report shall stand. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 19 MOTION by Defendants City Of Chicago, Tyreon Davis, Kyle Kruzel, Justin Quaglia, Kyler Smith, Jonathan Smith Jr. for extension of time to file answer for All Defendants - UNOPPOSED (Bammel, Emily) |
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City Of Chicago, Tyreon Davis, Kyle Kruzel, Justin Quaglia, Kyler Smith, Jonathan Smith Jr. by Scott A. Cohen (Cohen, Scott) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City Of Chicago, Tyreon Davis, Kyle Kruzel, Justin Quaglia, Kyler Smith, Jonathan Smith Jr. by Emily Rachel Bammel (Bammel, Emily) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONeal Johnson as to Kyler Smith on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (jg, ) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONeal Johnson as to Sargent O'Donnell on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (jg, ) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONeal Johnson as to Kyle Kruzel on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (jg, ) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONeal Johnson as to Justin Quaglia on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (jg, ) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONeal Johnson as to City Of Chicago on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (jg, ) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONeal Johnson as to Tyreon Davis on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (jg, ) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONeal Johnson as to Yasmine Laplanche on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (jg, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ONeal Johnson as to Jonathan Smith Jr. on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (jg, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants City Of Chicago, Tyreon Davis, Kyle Kruzel, Yasmine Laplanche, Justin Quaglia, Sargent O'Donnell, Kyler Smith, Jonathan Smith Jr. (dxb, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER: An initial status report and, if appropriate, case management plan is due on or before December 7, 2022. In conformity with General Order 21-0027 and due to the need for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court is ordering written status reports instead of routine oral status hearings. This includes initial status hearings and scheduling conferences under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). See Judge Gottschall's website for the procedure for requesting a hearing and for requirements for status reports and discovery plans during the COVID-19 pandemic. No Rule 26(f) discovery plan should be submitted until all defendants have been served. If all defendants have not been served by the deadline for filing an initial status report, the report should so state and propose a deadline for filing a discovery plan. The parties are directed to discuss settlement and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. They are further directed to meet and confer regarding a proposed discovery plan. See Judge Gottschall's civil case management packet regarding pretrial case management procedures at: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 10/6/2022.Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 10/6/2022. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Enter order denying without prejudice plaintiff's motion to stay #4 . Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jg, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff ONeal Johnson to stay complaint (jg, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff ONeal Johnson (jg, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (jg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and 0 copies filed by ONeal Johnson (jg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
