Bolden v. City of Chicago et al
| Percy Bolden |
| City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby, Ronald Watts, Brian Bolton, Robert Gonzalez, Manuel Leano, Kallatt Mohammed, Douglas Nichols, Jr. and Elsworth Smith, Jr. |
| 1:2022cv05437 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan H Lefkow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby by Dhaviella Nichelle Harris (Harris, Dhaviella) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby by Daniel Jerome Burns (Burns, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby by Paul A. Michalik (Michalik, Paul) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby by Daniel Matthew Noland (Noland, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants City of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby by Terrence Michael Burns (Burns, Terrence) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Initial status hearing is set for 12/13/2022 at 11:00 a.m. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (877) 402-9753 and the access code is 1564342. Counsel of record will receive an email the day before the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice (ags) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Percy Bolden by Joel A. Flaxman (Flaxman, Joel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Flaxman, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Percy Bolden; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19909549.(Flaxman, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
