Saucedo v. Carpenter et al
Velia Saucedo |
Kendrick Carpenter and Maverick Transportation, LLC |
1:2022cv05452 |
October 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Charles P Kocoras |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Telephonic status hearing held and continued to 1/10/2023 at 10:10 a.m. For the telephonic status hearing, parties are to use the following call-in number: (888) 684 8852, conference code 8819984. Counsel of record will receive an email the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. COUNSEL MUST TYPE IN THEIR NAME WHEN JOINING THE CALL. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Telephonic status hearing set for 12/1/2022 at 10:10 a.m. For the telephonic status hearing, parties are to use the following call-in number: (888) 684 8852, conference code 8819984. Counsel of record will receive an email the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. COUNSEL MUST TYPE IN THEIR NAME WHEN JOINING THE CALL. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Thank you for your cooperation. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
Filing 5 REFUND PROCESSED re REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of $402.00, receipt no. AILNDC-19911945. (lw, ) |
Filing 4 REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of $402.00, receipt no. AILNDC-19911945, regarding complaint #1 Saucedo V. Carpenter et al. (Teich, Michael) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Velia Saucedo by Michael Loren Teich (Teich, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Teich, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Velia Saucedo; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19912078.(Teich, Michael) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.