Miranda v. Ruby's Fast Food Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Maadi Ornan Martinez Miranda
Defendant: Ruby's Fast Food Corp. and Nickie Rodica
Case Number: 1:2022cv05453
Filed: October 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Steven C Seeger
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Nickie Rodica, Ruby's Fast Food Corp.(Hardiman, Eugene)
November 4, 2022 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendants' motion for extra time (Dckt. No. #7 ) is hereby granted. The response to the complaint is due by December 2, 2022. Mailed notice (jjr, )
November 2, 2022 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance (Hardiman, Eugene) Modified on 11/3/2022 (kl, ).
November 2, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Eugene Christopher Hardiman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #7 before Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 11/10/2022 at 09:00 AM. (Hardiman, Eugene)
November 2, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION by Defendants Nickie Rodica, Ruby's Fast Food Corp. for extension of time to file answer (Hardiman, Eugene)
October 21, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maadi Ornan Martinez Miranda as to Ruby's Fast Food Corp. on 10/13/2022, answer due 11/3/2022. (Nolan, Timothy)
October 19, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maadi Ornan Martinez Miranda as to Nickie Rodica on 10/13/2022, answer due 11/3/2022. (Nolan, Timothy)
October 6, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Nickie Rodica, Ruby's Fast Food Corp. (rp, )
October 5, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by December 19, 2022. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
October 5, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Maadi Ornan Martinez Miranda by Timothy Michael Nolan (Nolan, Timothy)
October 5, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Nolan, Timothy)
October 5, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Maadi Ornan Martinez Miranda; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19912197. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Nolan, Timothy)
October 5, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mbh, )
October 5, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mbh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miranda v. Ruby's Fast Food Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maadi Ornan Martinez Miranda
Represented By: Timothy Michael Nolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruby's Fast Food Corp.
Represented By: Eugene Christopher Hardiman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nickie Rodica
Represented By: Eugene Christopher Hardiman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?