Keel v. BG Medical, LLC et al
| Tammy Keel |
| BG Medical, LLC, Aspide Medical and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 1:2022cv05509 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| John F Kness |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STATUS Report by Tammy Keel (Brenes, Troy) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Motion by counsel for leave to appear pro hac vice #6 is granted. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Aspide Medical, BG Medical, LLC (smb, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20099580. (Brenes, Troy) |
Filing 5
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 10/18/2022: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 12/16/2022 at 9:00 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice(ef, )
|
| Filing 4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable John F. Kness for all further proceedings, pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 294(b). Honorable Robert W. Gettleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/12/2022. (ph, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tammy Keel by Alan J. Bernstein (Bernstein, Alan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bernstein, Alan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tammy Keel; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19922913.(Bernstein, Alan) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
