Chapman v. Foxx et al
| Reginald L Chapman |
| Kimberly Foxx |
| 1:2022cv05510 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court takes Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 under consideration. If Plaintiff wants to proceed further, he must (1) explain in writing and under oath why he believes he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) submit a certified trust fund account statement showing all transactions in his account from September 30, 2022, to the date he responds to this order. Alternatively, he may pay the Court's $402.00 filing fee. Payment may be made by check or money order payable to Clerk, United States District Court. Failure to fully comply with this order by December 1, 2022, may result in summary dismissal of this case. The Court defers review of Plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A until after his fee status has been resolved. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 11/1/2022. Mailed notice (ags)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Reginald L Chapman for attorney representation. (aee, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Reginald L Chapman for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (aee, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Reginald L Chapman (Exhibits). (aee, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Reginald L Chapman. (aee, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (aee, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (aee, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chapman v. Foxx et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Reginald L Chapman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kimberly Foxx | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
