Martinez v. Aaron Thomas Company, Inc.
| Ernestina Martinez |
| Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv05516 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Telephonic motion hearing held. Counsel appeared telephonically. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant's motion for to stay #11 is granted in part. This matter is stayed pending a ruling by the Illinois Supreme Court in the Tims matter regarding the proper statute of limitations to be applied to BIPA actions. The Court understand Tims has been argued. Telephonic status hearing set for 1/18/23 at 9:30am. If Tims has not been decided by the Illinois Supreme Court, the Court will lift the stay and discovery will proceed. The court will set a date for Defendant to respond to the complaint. Parties should call 866-434-5269; access code 3751971. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Hearing on Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings or, alternatively to stay #11 is set for 11/10/22 at 9:30am. Parties should call 866-434-5269; access code 3751971. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM by Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. in support of motion for judgment on the pleadings #11 or, alternatively to stay (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Northrip, William) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. for judgment on the pleadings or, alternatively to stay (Northrip, William) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Aaron Thomas Company, Inc.(Northrip, William) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ernestina Martinez by Mara Ann Baltabols (Baltabols, Mara) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Ernestina Martinez by David J. Fish (Fish, David) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time #5 is granted. The time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to November 4, 2022. On or before 11/21/22, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (rc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Northrip, William) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. (Northrip, William) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. by William Francis Northrip (Northrip, William) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Northrip, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois, case number (2022LA000248) filed by Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19923482. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Emiko Bacon)(Northrip, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ernestina Martinez | |
| Represented By: | David J. Fish |
| Represented By: | Mara Ann Baltabols |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aaron Thomas Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William Francis Northrip |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
