United States of America v. Bills
Plaintiff: United States Of America(FTCA)
Petitioner: Milton Bills
Case Number: 1:2022cv05532
Filed: October 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Joan B Gottschall
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2022 Filing 17 DIGITAL EXHIBIT submitted by United States Of America(FTCA) regarding #16 For more information, please visit https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/ExhibitDrop. If you wish to download a digital exhibit, please send your request to the Certified Copy Desk (CCD) inbox at CCD_ILND@ilnd.uscourts.gov. You will be provided with an invoice and charged according to the Fee Schedule. Once your payment has been processed, you will receive a URL via email to download the exhibit. (sxh, )
November 8, 2022 Filing 16 STATUS Report by United States Of America(FTCA) (Rojas, G. David)
November 8, 2022 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Milton Bills relies on a video to undermine the basis for the sentence he received for his supervised release violation. Counsel are directed to tell the court when and how this video was received. Given the visually confusing nature of this video, any other available videos should be turned over to the court. If additional videos have not been filed by 11/15/2022, a status report is due on that date. Mailed notice (mjc, )
November 3, 2022 Filing 14 REPLY by Petitioner Milton Bills to Response #9 (Schindler, Ralph)
November 1, 2022 Filing 13 STATUS Report by Milton Bills (Rojas, G. David)
October 31, 2022 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: In its response #9 , the government quotes from the transcript of petitioner's supervised release revocation hearing held 10/15/2021. The court has been unable to locate this transcript on the docket of this 28 U.S.C. 2255 proceeding or in the criminal case against Mr. Bills, No. 10-cr-0096-2. On or before 11/4/2022, the government is requested to either point the court to a copy of the transcript on the docket or file a copy of the transcript. Mailed notice (mjc, )
October 28, 2022 Filing 10 DIGITAL EXHIBIT submitted by United States Of America(FTCA) regarding #9 For more information, please visit https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/ExhibitDrop. If you wish to download a digital exhibit, please send your request to the Certified Copy Desk (CCD) inbox at CCD_ILND@ilnd.uscourts.gov. You will be provided with an invoice and charged according to the Fee Schedule. Once your payment has been processed, you will receive a URL via email to download the exhibit. (smb, )
October 28, 2022 Filing 9 RESPONSE by Plaintiff United States Of America(FTCA) to amended complaint #7 (Rojas, G. David)
October 17, 2022 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings in the United States District Courts, the government is directed to file a response to Milton Bills's amended 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion #7 on or before 10/28/2022, and any reply is due on or before 11/4/2022. This court ordinarily gives the government at least 28 days to respond to a 2255 motion. A somewhat expedited schedule has been set in this case because Mr. Bills argues that his advisory guidelines range would be 8-14 months if he is resentenced, and Mr. Bills has served approximately 12 months of his sentence. Mailed notice (mjc, )
October 14, 2022 Filing 7 First AMENDED complaint by Milton Bills against Milton Bills (Schindler, Ralph)
October 12, 2022 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of G. David Rojas as U.S. Attorney for Plaintiff United States Of America(FTCA) (Rojas, G. David)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 10/12/2022. Mailed notice(mjc, )
October 12, 2022 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Enter order dismissing Milton Bills's 28 U.S.C. 2255 petition #1 without prejudice. In accordance with the order, Milton Bills's amended 2255 motion is due on or before 10/14/2022. Mailed notice (mjc, )
October 11, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (ak, )
October 10, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioner Milton Bills by Ralph Joseph Schindler, Jr (Schindler, Ralph)
October 10, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schindler, Ralph)
October 10, 2022 Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copies by Milton Bills (Schindler, Ralph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Bills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Of America(FTCA)
Represented By: G. David Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Milton Bills
Represented By: Ralph Joseph Schindler, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?