Outley v. Feinerman et al
| Micheal Outley |
| Honorable JUdge Gary Feinerman, CITY OF CHICAGO, Scott Crouch, John Catalano, Rena Honorow, Gary Feinerman and ROBERT MUSSEN |
| 1:2022cv05583 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: This case was dismissed by order entered on 1/3/2023, therefore no answers are due. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 19
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Micheal Outley. Gary Feinerman waiver sent on 10/28/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
Filing 18
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Micheal Outley as to City of Chicago on 1/9/2023, answer due 1/30/2023. (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
Filing 17
ENTERED JUDGMENT on 1/3/2023. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 16
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: In this action, Plaintiff Outley seeks equitable relief against the lawyers and defendants to an underlying case and District Court Judge Gary Feinerman, who was presiding over that case. See Outley v. City of Chicago, 17 C 8633. Plaintiff seeks declaratory judgments that conduct by the lawyers/parties and certain rulings in that case were incorrect and violated Plaintiff's due process rights. The underlying case was dismissed with prejudice on December 30, 2022. Outley v. City of Chicago, 17 C 8633, Dkt. 343, 344, 345. This Court has an obligation to police its subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte. See Wernsing v. Thompson, 423 F.3d 732, 743 (7th Cir. 2005). Article III standing "requires that a party seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of the federal courts must present an 'actual case or controversy.'" Perry v. Sheahan, 222 F.3d 309, 313 (7th Cir. 2000). Where a plaintiff seeks equitable relief, he "must show a significant likelihood and immediacy of sustaining some direct injury." Sierakowski v. Ryan, 223 F.3d 440, 443 (7th Cir. 2000) (citing Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 21011 (1995)). Because any allegedly wrongful conduct here by the defendants ended upon the dismissal with prejudice of the underlying action, there is no realistic threat of future harm to Plaintiff, and he lacks standing to bring this action. Horton v. Marovich, 925 F. Supp. 532, 539 (N.D. Ill. 1996) (dismissing case for lack of Article III standing where the plaintiff sought equitable relief against judge and parties in an underlying case and the underlying case had been dismissed). Accordingly, this case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 15
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, )
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff's "Corrected Amended Complaint" #13 is stricken because he did not follow Judge Durkin's procedures for amending pleadings as listed on the court website. If Plaintiff desires to amend his complaint, he must re-file it with a redline or comparison document attached as an exhibit showing the amendments made to the previous iteration of the complaint. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 13
CORRECTED AMENDED complaint by Micheal Outley against All Defendants (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants City of Chicago, Gary Feinerman (dxb, )
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for extension of time to file responsive pleading #10 is granted. Defendants Scott Crouch, John Catalano, Rena Honorow, and Robert Mussen are to respond to the Complaint by 1/12/2023. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 11
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants John Catalano, Scott Crouch, Rena Honorow, ROBERT MUSSEN by Jason Richard Schabinger (Schabinger, Jason)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION by Defendants John Catalano, Scott Crouch, Rena Honorow, ROBERT MUSSEN for extension of time Individual City of Chicago Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Their Responsive Pleading (Duffy, James)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants John Catalano, Scott Crouch, Rena Honorow, ROBERT MUSSEN by James David Duffy (Duffy, James)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 1/23/2023, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
|
Filing 7
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Micheal Outley. ROBERT MUSSEN waiver sent on 10/13/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Micheal Outley. Rena Honorow waiver sent on 10/13/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Micheal Outley. Scott Crouch waiver sent on 11/10/2022, answer due 1/9/2023. (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
Filing 4
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Micheal Outley. John Catalano waiver sent on 11/10/2022, answer due 1/9/2023. (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Micheal Outley by Calvita J. Frederick (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT filed by Micheal Outley; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19933475. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Declaration, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit)(Frederick, Calvita)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jk2, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jk2, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
