Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C. v. Gain Hash, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C.
Defendant: Gain Hash, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv05595
Filed: October 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Steven C Seeger
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 11, 2022 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C. regarding Summons and Complaint served on Gain Hash, Inc. on 10/27/2022 (Ross, Elisabeth)
November 1, 2022 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed Plaintiff's certification of its citizenship. Based on the representations of the parties, there is complete diversity of citizenship. Mailed notice (jjr, )
October 27, 2022 Filing 8 Certification As To Citizenship of Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C. by Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C. (Ross, Elisabeth)
October 24, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Gain Hash, Inc. (smb, )
October 17, 2022 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by January 2, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
October 17, 2022 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the complaint in this new case. The Court directs the Clerk's Office to correct the docket. The complaint seeks $453,085, but the top of the docket (where it says "Demand") says that Plaintiff is seeking $453,085,000. By October 28, 2022, Plaintiff must file a certification addressing whether any of its members is a citizen of Delaware or California. The Court reviewed the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint, but given the number of people in California, the Court wants to be sure that it stands on a solid jurisdictional footing. Mailed notice (jjr, )
October 12, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C. by Janet Ruth Davis (Davis, Janet)
October 12, 2022 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C. (Ross, Elisabeth)
October 12, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C. by Elisabeth Charlotte Ross (Ross, Elisabeth)
October 12, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ross, Elisabeth)
October 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C.; (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Ross, Elisabeth)
October 12, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )
October 12, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C. v. Gain Hash, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C.
Represented By: Janet Ruth Davis
Represented By: Elisabeth Charlotte Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gain Hash, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?