Archibald v. CJ Logistics America, LLC
| Rickey Archibald |
| CJ Logistics America, LLC |
| 1:2022cv05658 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Heather K McShain |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge McShain for discovery supervision, including the authority to adjust all deadlines #13 . The Court has reviewed Judge Chang's order of 12/07/2022 #12 and the parties' joint status report #11 and adopts the parties' proposed discovery schedule as follows: Initial written discovery requests to be issued by 01/04/2023. All fact discovery to be completed by 06/07/2023. The parties state that they are uncertain whether expert discovery will be necessary, but they will revisit this issue closer to the end of the fact discovery period. A joint status report is due on 02/06/2023 to update the Court on: (a) the progress of discovery; (b) the status of settlement discussions, if any; and (c) any other issues the parties wish to raise with the Court. The parties may contact chambers at any time (by email to Chambers_McShain@ilnd.uscourts.gov) if they would like the Court's assistance with settlement. (rbf, ) |
| Filing 13 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Heather K. McShain for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: Discovery supervision (including the authority to adjust all deadlines). (mw, ) Emailed notice. |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 11, Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are due on 12/28/2022. Discovery supervision is otherwise referred to the magistrate judge (including the authority to adjust all deadlines). The tracking status hearing of 12/09/2022 for Judge Chang is reset to 12/30/2022 at 8:30 a.m. (which is after the 12/19/2022 answer deadline), but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 11 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Rickey Archibald (Eisenback, Chad) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rickey Archibald as to CJ Logistics America, LLC on 11/28/2022, answer due 12/19/2022. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant CJ Logistics America, LLC by Michael Kim Chropowicz (Chropowicz, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Katarina Stockton's motion to appear pro hac vice for Defendant #7 is granted. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20063744. (Stockton, Katarina) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 12/09/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 11/30/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant CJ Logistics America, LLC (dxb, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rickey Archibald by Eric Donald Coleman (Coleman, Eric) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rickey Archibald by Chad William Eisenback (Eisenback, Chad) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rickey Archibald by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rickey Archibald; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19947663. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
