Riddle v. Cermak Heakth Services (CHS) et al
| Michael Riddle |
| Cermak Health Services (CHS), Superintendent John & Jane Doe, Susan Shebel, Thomas J. Dart and Nurses John & Jane Doe |
| 1:2022cv05676 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS Issued to U.S. Marshal Service as to Defendant Susan Shebel. (kl, ) Modified on 12/15/2022 (kl, ). |
| MAILED a copy of order #10 to PACER Service Center at https://pacer.uscourts.gov, to the Systems Department of the Northern District of Illinois, to recruited counsel, and to Plaintiff along with two blank USM-285 (Marshals service) forms. (kl, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff has paid the filing fee and his complaint is accepted. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to: (1) issue summons for service of the complaint #1 on Defendant Shebel by the U.S. Marshal; (2) dismiss all other Defendants; and (3) send Plaintiff two blank USM-285 (Marshals service) forms and a copy of this order. Plaintiff is directed to complete the USM-285 by January 5, 2023. The Clerk is also directed to send a copy of this order to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal is appointed to effect service and is authorized to send a request for waiver of service in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) before attempting personal service. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is granted. The Court requests that Stephen J. Smalling of Capron and Avgerinos P.C., 55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 900, Chicago, 60603, represent Plaintiff in this case in accordance with counsel's trial bar obligations under the District Court's Local Rules 83.11 and 83.37 (N.D. Ill.). Counsel is directed to file an appearance in this case by January 5, 2023. A copy of this order shall be sent to the PACER Service Center at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/, to the Systems Department of the Northern District of Illinois, to Plaintiff, and to recruited counsel. Counsel is informed that because of the statute of limitations, time may be of the essence to determine the identities of other potential defendants. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 12/15/2022. Mailed notice. (kl, ) Modified on 12/15/2022 (kl, ).
|
| Filing 9 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Riddle; Jury Demand. (Envelope postmark 10/7/2022). (jn, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #6 is denied. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must pay the $402 filing fee. If Plaintiff does not comply by December 15, 2022, this case will be summarily dismissed. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 11/21/2022. Mailed notice. (kl, )
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Michael Riddle for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments) (Envelope not postmarked) (kl, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must either (1) submit a renewed application that is signed by him, certified by an appropriate official, and accompanied by a copy of his trust fund statement showing all transactions in his account for the six-month period immediately preceding his initiation of this action; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. Failure to comply with this order by November 10, 2022,will result in summary dismissal of this case.Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. Failure to keep the Court informed of his address may lead to dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a Court order and for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 10/20/2022. Mailed notice. (kl, )
|
| MAILED a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of the 10/20/2022 order to Michael Riddle. (kl, ) |
| MAILED Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Michael Riddle (kl, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kl, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Riddle for attorney representation (Attachment) (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Michael Riddle for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (kl, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (kl, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Michael Riddle (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 10/7/2022)(kl, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
