Sturdivant v. UA Fitness LLC
| Taiylor S. Sturdivant |
| UA Fitness LLC doing business as Urban Athlete |
| 1:2022cv05698 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Maria Valdez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: The parties' agreed discovery schedule is entered as follows: amendments to pleadings or actions to join other parties must be filed by 12/15/22; written discovery must be propounded no later than 5/16/23; fact discovery closes 6/30/23; initial experts must be disclosed by 7/21/23 and deposed by 8/11/23; and rebuttal experts must be disclosed by 9/15/23 and deposed by 9/27/23. Because the 6/30/23 fact discovery deadline is so generous, there will be no extensions absent extraordinary circumstances, and the parties must proceed expeditiously to complete discovery by the deadline they chose. The Court does not consider obligations in other cases, vacations, illnesses, or difficulty scheduling depositions to be extraordinary, as there is more than enough time to complete discovery even if those expected complications arise. A status report on discovery and the prospects of settlement is due by 1/20/23. The parties are strongly encouraged to consider all settlement options and may advise the Court if they wish to begin the process of scheduling a settlement conference prior to that date. Mailed notice (lp, ) |
| Filing 12 STATUS Report JOINT by Taiylor S. Sturdivant (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: This matter has been referred to Judge Valdez for discovery supervision and scheduling and to conduct a settlement conference. The parties must file a joint status report with a proposed scheduling order no later than 12/2/22. Mailed notice (lp, ) |
| Filing 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Maria Valdez for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision and scheduling, to set a deadline to file amended pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement. (rao, ) |
| Filing 9 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to Complaint by UA Fitness LLC(Leech, Steven) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant UA Fitness LLC by Steven Hesser Leech (Leech, Steven) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant UA Fitness LLC by David S. Americus (Americus, David) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Taiylor S. Sturdivant as to UA Fitness LLC on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Taiylor S. Sturdivant by Eric Donald Coleman (Coleman, Eric) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Taiylor S. Sturdivant by Chad William Eisenback (Eisenback, Chad) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Taiylor S. Sturdivant by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Taiylor S. Sturdivant; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19954410. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant UA Fitness LLC (dxb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
