Riek Jr. v. Kijakazi
| Anthony C. Riek Jr. |
| Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2022cv05824 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: This matter is before the Court for review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. The parties are strongly encouraged to consider consenting to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Should the parties elect to do so, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_public/consent.pdf. Otherwise, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 45 days after the filing of the answer to the complaint and/or the administrative record. The Commissioner's response and brief in support of affirming the decision subject to review is due 30 days thereafter. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due 10 days thereafter. The Court will not consider extension requests absent extenuating circumstances. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file the electronic certified administrative record #7 is granted. The time for filing the Electronic Certified Administrative Record is enlarged until January 19, 2023. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Unopposed) (Lambert, Kate) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Kate F Lambert as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Lambert, Kate) |
Filing 5
ORDER : Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #4 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 10/25/2022. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Anthony C. Riek Jr. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Anthony C. Riek Jr. by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Anthony C. Riek Jr. (Attachments: #1 AC Decision) (Marvin, Cody) Modified on 10/24/2022 (jh, ). |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
