Coleman v. City Of Chicago et al
| Jermaine Coleman |
| City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Brian Bolton, Officer Matthew Cadman, Alvin Jones, Kallatt Mohammed, Calvin Ridgell and Gerome Summers, Jr. |
| 1:2022cv05842 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Ronald A Guzman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Matthew Cadman by Thomas More Leinenweber (Leinenweber, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The parties are directed to confer no later than 1/13/2023 and file a joint written initial status report by 1/20/2023. Plaintiff is responsible for initiating such a conference, and all lead counsel for all parties must participate. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
Filing 10
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that 19 CV 1717, In Re: Watts Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings is assigned to the Hon. Franklin U. Valderrama; and It further appearing that the cases listed below are within the scope of those pretrial proceedings; therefore It is hereby ordered that Judge Valderamma shall preside over the pretrial proceedings in the cases listed below; and It is further ordered that Magistrate Judge Finnegan shall be the designated magistrate judge in these cases; and It is further ordered that these cases shall remain pending on the calendar of the judge to whom it is currently assigned, and that an order be entered in each case by Judge Valderrama at such time as the coordinated pretrial proceedings have concluded. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/8/2022. (exr, )
|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Dhaviella Nichelle Harris (Harris, Dhaviella) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Daniel Jerome Burns (Burns, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Paul A. Michalik (Michalik, Paul) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Daniel Matthew Noland (Noland, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Terrence Michael Burns (Burns, Terrence) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jermaine Coleman by Kenneth N Flaxman (Flaxman, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jermaine Coleman by Joel A. Flaxman (Flaxman, Joel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Flaxman, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jermaine Coleman; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19974719.(Flaxman, Joel) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jk2, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey I. Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jk2, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
