Key et al v. City Of Chicago et al
| George Key and Thomas Nash |
| City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Brian Bolton, Darryl Edwards, Robert Gonzalez, Alvin Jones, Kallatt Mohammed, Calvin Ridgell, John Rodriguez, Michael Spaargaren, Gerome Summers, Jr. and Kenneth Young, Jr. |
| 1:2022cv05844 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Michael Spaargaren by Thomas More Leinenweber (Leinenweber, Thomas) |
Filing 11
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that 19 CV 1717, In Re: Watts Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings is assigned to the Hon. Franklin U. Valderrama; and It further appearing that the cases listed below are within the scope of those pretrial proceedings; therefore It is hereby ordered that Judge Valderamma shall preside over the pretrial proceedings in the cases listed below; and It is further ordered that Magistrate Judge Finnegan shall be the designated magistrate judge in these cases; and It is further ordered that these cases shall remain pending on the calendar of the judge to whom it is currently assigned, and that an order be entered in each case by Judge Valderrama at such time as the coordinated pretrial proceedings have concluded. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/8/2022. (jn, )
|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 1/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Outline for the Initial Joint Status Report) (rao, ) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Dhaviella Nichelle Harris (Harris, Dhaviella) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Daniel Jerome Burns (Burns, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Paul A. Michalik (Michalik, Paul) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Daniel Matthew Noland (Noland, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City Of Chicago by Terrence Michael Burns (Burns, Terrence) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs George Key, Thomas Nash by Kenneth N Flaxman (Flaxman, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs George Key, Thomas Nash by Joel A. Flaxman (Flaxman, Joel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Flaxman, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Thomas Nash, George Key; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19974893.(Flaxman, Joel) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jk2, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jk2, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
