Marshall Amplification PLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
| Marshall Amplification PLC |
| The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 1:2022cv05880 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marshall Amplification PLC by Rachel S Miller (Miller, Rachel) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marshall Amplification PLC by Amy Crout Ziegler (Ziegler, Amy) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Marshall Amplification PLC by Justin R. Gaudio (Gaudio, Justin) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Marshall Amplification PLC (Gaudio, Justin) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Marshall Amplification PLC (Gaudio, Justin) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gaudio, Justin) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Marshall Amplification PLC for leave to file under seal (Gaudio, Justin) |
| Filing 2 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Marshall Amplification PLC Schedule A regarding complaint #1 (Gaudio, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marshall Amplification PLC; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19980096. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Gaudio, Justin) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marshall Amplification PLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marshall Amplification PLC | |
| Represented By: | Amy Crout Ziegler |
| Represented By: | Rachel S Miller |
| Represented By: | Justin R. Gaudio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
