Trotter v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al
Plaintiff: Rhoda Trotter
Defendant: Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Corporation and Elanco Animal Health, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv06012
Filed: November 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Robert Blakey
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2022 Filing 10 MAILED MDL Transfer in letter to counsel of record. (gcy, )
November 2, 2022 Filing 9 RECEIVED from Florida Middle; Case Number 8:22-cv-02183 (gcy)
November 1, 2022 Filing 8 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL ORDER (CTO-2) transferring case to: Northern District of Illinois. Transferee court case number: 22-cv-6012 MDL case number: 3009. (AG) [Transferred from Florida Middle on 11/2/2022.]
October 13, 2022 Filing 7 WAIVER of service returned executed on 10/12/2022 by Rhoda Trotter as to Elanco Animal Health, Inc. (Soffin, Rachel) Modified text on 10/13/2022 (MCB). [Transferred from Florida Middle on 11/2/2022.]
October 13, 2022 Filing 6 WAIVER of service returned executed on 10/12/2022 by Rhoda Trotter as to Bayer Healthcare LLC. (Soffin, Rachel) [Transferred from Florida Middle on 11/2/2022.]
September 22, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) [Transferred from Florida Middle on 11/2/2022.]
September 22, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) [Transferred from Florida Middle on 11/2/2022.]
September 21, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Bayer Healthcare LLC, Elanco Animal Health, Inc. (MCB) [Transferred from Florida Middle on 11/2/2022.]
September 21, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 8:22-cv-2183-CEH-MRM. (SJB) [Transferred from Florida Middle on 11/2/2022.]
September 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Elanco Animal Health, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20018292) filed by Rhoda Trotter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Bayer Healthcare, LLC, #3 Proposed Summons Elanco Animal Health, Inc.)(Soffin, Rachel) [Transferred from Florida Middle on 11/2/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trotter v. Bayer Healthcare LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhoda Trotter
Represented By: Rachel Soffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer Healthcare LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elanco Animal Health, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?