Bennett et al v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. et al
| Lauren Bennett, Michael Bennett, Terri E. Bennett, Jeffrey Bennett, Deborah Samuels and Elliot Samuels |
| Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc., Budsgunshop.com, LLC, Red Dot Arms, Inc., Robert Crimo, JR and Robert Crimo, III |
| 1:2022cv06171 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 32
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiffs in the related cases filed motions to remand. Responses are due by January 20, 2023. A reply is due by February 3, 2023. The Court requires a consolidated reply given the same counsel represent all Plaintiffs. This schedule supersedes any briefing schedule set by other District Court Judges before reassignment. The obligation to respond to the complaint is stayed pending a ruling on the motions to remand. The related cases are hereby consolidated for the purpose of resolving the motions to remand. All filings in the related cases shall appear on the docket of the lowest-numbered case (Roberts et al. v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., 22-cv-6169), until further order of the Court. The Court directs all counsel of record to file an appearance on the docket of the lead case (22-cv-6169). Mailed notice (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 31
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, )
|
|
Filing 30
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motions for leave to appear pro hac vice (Dckt. No. #26 , #27 and #28 ) are granted. Attorney H. Christopher Boehning, Jeffrey Recher, and Carly Lagrotteria are added as counsel for plaintiffs. Mailed notice (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 29
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jeffrey Bennett, Lauren Bennett, Michael Bennett, Terri E. Bennett, Deborah Samuels, Elliot Samuels by Alla Lefkowitz (Lefkowitz, Alla)
|
|
Filing 28
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20165495. (Lagrotteria, Carly)
|
|
Filing 27
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20165471. (Recher, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 26
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20165367. (Boehning, H. Christopher)
|
|
Filing 25
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger for all further proceedings. Honorable Robert W. Gettleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/16/2022. (ph, )
|
|
Filing 24
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Budsgunshop.com, LLC by Christopher Renzulli (Renzulli, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 23
MOTION by Plaintiffs Jeffrey Bennett, Lauren Bennett, Michael Bennett, Terri E. Bennett, Deborah Samuels, Elliot Samuels to remand (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Neiman, David)
|
|
Filing 22
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Budsgunshop.com, LLC by Scott Charles Allan (Allan, Scott)
|
|
Filing 21
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Smith & Wesson Defendants' Unopposed Motion To Modify Order Extending Time To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To Conform With Response Date Of Earliest Filed And Other Related Cases #20 is granted. All defendants' responsive pleadings due by the later of (1) January 6, 2023, or (2) 21 days following any order resolving Plaintiffs' motion to remand. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION by Defendants Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. for extension of time Unopposed Motion to Modify Order Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Conform with Response Date of Earliest Filed and Other Related Cases (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 19
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jeffrey Bennett, Lauren Bennett, Michael Bennett, Terri E. Bennett, Deborah Samuels, Elliot Samuels by Gina A. DeBoni (DeBoni, Gina)
|
|
Filing 18
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Attorney Edward Scheideman's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #17 on behalf of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Co., and Smith & Wesson, Inc. is granted. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20050747. on behalf of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.; Smith & Wesson Sales Company; and Smith & Wesson, Inc. (Schneideman, Edward)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Red Dot Arms, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion To Extend Time To Answer, Move, Or Otherwise Respond To The Complaint #14 is granted. Defendant's responsive pleading due after the later of 12/7/2022 or this court's ruling on a motion to remain if plaintiff files such motion. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION by Defendant Red Dot Arms, Inc. for extension of time unopposed to answer, move, or otherwise respond to complaint (Braum, Scott)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendant Budsgunshop.Com, LLC's Unopposed Motion To Extend Time To Answer, Move, Or Otherwise Respond To The Complaint #12 is granted. Defendant's responsive pleading due after the later of 12/7/2022 or this court's ruling on a motion to remain if plaintiff files such motion. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION by Defendant Budsgunshop.com, LLC for extension of time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) (Lyon, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 11
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Budsgunshop.com, LLC by Bruce W. Lyon (Lyon, Bruce)
|
|
Filing 10
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. by Andrew Arthur Lothson (Lothson, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Red Dot Arms, Inc. by Scott L. Braum (Braum, Scott)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Smith & Wesson Defendants' Unopposed Motion To Extend Time To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To The Complaint #7 is granted. Defendant's responsive pleading due after the later of 12/7/2022 or this court's ruling on a motion to remain if plaintiff files such motion. Mailed notice (cn).
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION by Defendants Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. for extension of time - Unopposed Motion To Extend Time To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To The Complaint - (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 6
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jeffrey Bennett, Lauren Bennett, Michael Bennett, Terri E. Bennett, Deborah Samuels, Elliot Samuels by Antonio Maurizio Romanucci (Romanucci, Antonio)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jeffrey Bennett, Lauren Bennett, Michael Bennett, Terri E. Bennett, Deborah Samuels, Elliot Samuels by David Adam Neiman (Neiman, David)
|
|
Filing 4
MAILED notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (daj, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (daj, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. by Kenneth L. Schmetterer (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court 19th Judicial Circuit Lake County, case number (22LA00000491) filed by Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20022234. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
