Toledo et al v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. et al
Ricardo Toledo, Petra Toledo, Josefina Toledo and Alejo Toledo |
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc., Budsgunshop.com, LLC, Red Dot Arms, Inc., Robert Crimo, JR and Robert Crimo, III |
1:2022cv06191 |
November 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Steven C Seeger |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiffs in the related cases filed motions to remand. Responses are due by January 20, 2023. A reply is due by February 3, 2023. The Court requires a consolidated reply given the same counsel represent all Plaintiffs. This schedule supersedes any briefing schedule set by other District Court Judges before reassignment. The obligation to respond to the complaint is stayed pending a ruling on the motions to remand. The related cases are hereby consolidated for the purpose of resolving the motions to remand. All filings in the related cases shall appear on the docket of the lowest-numbered case (Roberts et al. v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., 22-cv-6169), until further order of the Court. The Court directs all counsel of record to file an appearance on the docket of the lead case (22-cv-6169). Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
Filing 32 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
Filing 31 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motions for leave to appear pro hac vice (Dckt. No. #27 , #28 and #29 ) are granted. Attorney H. Christopher Boehning,Jeffrey Recher, and Carly Lagrotteria are added as counsel for plaintiffs. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 30 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alejo Toledo, Josefina Toledo, Petra Toledo, Ricardo Toledo by Alla Lefkowitz (Lefkowitz, Alla) |
Filing 29 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20165520. (Lagrotteria, Carly) |
Filing 28 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20165497. (Recher, Jeffrey) |
Filing 27 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20165456. (Boehning, H. Christopher) |
Filing 26 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger for all further proceedings according to the provisions of Local Rule 40.4. Honorable Thomas M. Durkin no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/19/2022.(jh, ) |
Filing 25 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Budsgunshop.com, LLC by Christopher Renzulli (Renzulli, Christopher) |
Filing 24 MOTION by Plaintiffs Alejo Toledo, Josefina Toledo, Petra Toledo, Ricardo Toledo to remand (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Neiman, David) |
Filing 23 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Budsgunshop.com, LLC by Scott Charles Allan (Allan, Scott) |
Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion to modify order extending time to answer or otherwise respond to conform with response date of earliest filed and other related cases #21 is granted. All defendants are to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by the later of (1) 1/6/2023, or (2) 21 days following any order resolving Plaintiffs' motion to remand. The 1/17/2023 joint status report deadline is vacated. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 21 MOTION by Defendants Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. for extension of time Unopposed Motion to Modify Order Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Conform with Response Date of Earliest Filed and Other Related Cases (Schmetterer, Kenneth) |
Filing 20 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alejo Toledo, Josefina Toledo, Petra Toledo, Ricardo Toledo by Gina A. DeBoni (DeBoni, Gina) |
Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion to appear pro hac vice #18 is granted. Attorney Edward S. Scheideman, III for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, and Smith & Wesson, Inc. added. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20050759. On behalf of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.; Smith & Wesson Sales Company; Smith & Wesson, Inc. (Schneideman, Edward) |
Filing 17 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. (Schmetterer, Kenneth) |
Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for extension of time #15 is granted. Red Dot Arms, Inc. is to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 21 days after the later of (1) 12/7/2022 or (2) this Court's ruling on any such motion to remand that Plaintiffs file. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant Red Dot Arms, Inc. for extension of time unopposed to answer, move, or otherwise respond to complaint (Braum, Scott) |
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for extension of time #13 is granted. BudsGunShop.com, LLC is to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 21 days after the later of: (1) 12/7/2022 or (2) a decision by this Court on any such motion to remand filed by plaintiffs. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Budsgunshop.com, LLC for extension of time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) (Lyon, Bruce) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Budsgunshop.com, LLC by Bruce W. Lyon (Lyon, Bruce) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. by Andrew Arthur Lothson (Lothson, Andrew) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Red Dot Arms, Inc. by Scott L. Braum (Braum, Scott) |
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for extension of time to answer #8 is granted. Smith & Wesson is to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 21 days after the later of (1) 12/7/2022 or (2) this Court's ruling on any such motion to remand that Plaintiffs file. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendants Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding notice of removal, #1 - Unopposed Motion To Extend Time To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To The Complaint - (Schmetterer, Kenneth) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alejo Toledo, Josefina Toledo, Petra Toledo, Ricardo Toledo by Antonio Maurizio Romanucci (Romanucci, Antonio) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alejo Toledo, Josefina Toledo, Petra Toledo, Ricardo Toledo by David Adam Neiman (Neiman, David) |
Filing 5 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (daj, ) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 1/17/2023, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jb, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (daj, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. by Kenneth L. Schmetterer (Schmetterer, Kenneth) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schmetterer, Kenneth) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court 19th Judicial Circuit Lake County, case number (22LA00000495) filed by Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., Smith & Wesson Sales Company, Smith & Wesson, Inc. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20023448. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Schmetterer, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.