Motley Crue, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Plaintiff: Motley Crue, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Case Number: 1:2022cv06221
Filed: November 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2022 Filing 17 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, )
November 9, 2022 Filing 16 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (cxr, )
November 9, 2022 Filing 15 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (cxr, )
November 8, 2022 Filing 14 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Thomas Schlegel regarding memorandum in support of motion, #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2-1)(Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in support of 12 Exparte motion (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration, #3 Declaration of Thomas Schlegel, #4 Exhibit 1, of Thomas Schlegel's declaration)(Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. for leave to file excess pages (Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. for leave to file under seal (Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 9 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. [Amended] Schedule A to Complaint (1) and Schedule A to Complaint(2) (Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling)
November 8, 2022 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam)
November 8, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi)
November 8, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Motley Crue, Inc. (Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Motley Crue, Inc. Schedule A to Complaint #1 (Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Motley Crue, Inc.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20027080. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Vogt, Keith)
November 8, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jb, )
November 8, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Motley Crue, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Motley Crue, Inc.
Represented By: Yi Bu
Represented By: Adam Grodman
Represented By: Yanling Jiang
Represented By: Keith A. Vogt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?