Toho Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Plaintiff: Toho Co., Ltd.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Case Number: 1:2022cv06258
Filed: November 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John J Tharp
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2022 Filing 25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The plaintiff is directed to file a status report regarding this matter on or before 01/10/2023. Mailed notice (air, )
December 29, 2022 Filing 24 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, )
December 8, 2022 Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The plaintiff's motion to extend the temporary restraining order #22 is denied. The original 14-day TRO has previously been extended by 14-days #21 , and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2), "28 days is the outer limit for a TRO without the consent of the enjoined part[ies]...." H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 844 (7th Cir. 2012). Any further extension of a TRO without consent of the enjoined parties is technically a preliminary injunction, id. at 845; and the plaintiff's motion to extend does not indicate the notice requirement for entry of a preliminary injunction has been met, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(1). Mailed notice (air, )
December 7, 2022 Filing 22 MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. for extension of time for Temporary Restraining Order (Vogt, Keith)
November 22, 2022 Filing 21 EXTENSION of Temporary Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 11/22/2022. Mailed notice(air, )
November 22, 2022 Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Plaintiff's motion to extend the temporary restraining order #19 is granted. Enter order. Mailed notice (air, )
November 21, 2022 Filing 19 MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. for extension of time for Temporary Restraining Order (Vogt, Keith)
November 17, 2022 Filing 18 SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 15,000.00 posted by Toho Co., Ltd. (Document not scanned) (ph, )
November 14, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (smb, )
November 10, 2022 Filing 17 SEALED Temporary Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 11/10/2022. Mailed notice(air, )
November 10, 2022 Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:On the grounds set forth in the motion, plaintiff's ex parte motion for TRO 11 is granted. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal #9 and to exceed page limitation #10 are granted. Enter temporary restraining order. Mailed notice (air, )
November 10, 2022 Filing 15 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (ph, )
November 10, 2022 Filing 14 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (Attachments: #1 (List of Trademarks, Exhibit 1))(ph, )
November 9, 2022 Filing 13 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Koji Ueda regarding memorandum in support of motion #12 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, Part 1, #2 Exhibit 2, Part 2)(Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM In Support of 11 Ex Parte Motion (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1-4, Declaration of Keith Vogt, #3 Declaration of Koji Ueda, #4 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Koji Ueda)(Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. for leave to file excess pages (Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. for leave to file [Certain] Documents Under Seal (Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling)
November 9, 2022 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam)
November 9, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi)
November 9, 2022 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Toho Co., Ltd. (Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Toho Co., Ltd. Schedule A to Complaint #1 (Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Toho Co., Ltd.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20030767. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Vogt, Keith)
November 9, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (sxh, )
November 9, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toho Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toho Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Yi Bu
Represented By: Keith A. Vogt
Represented By: Adam Grodman
Represented By: Yanling Jiang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?