Vinet v. Chadek et al
| Richard J Vinet |
| David Chadek and Derryl Blackburn |
| 1:2022cv06482 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time #19 is denied as moot; the filing fee has been received and summons has issued on Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/11/2023. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER : Plaintiff has paid the filing fee and his complaint #17 is accepted. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to (1) dismiss Defendant Derryl Blackburn; (2) issue summons for service of the complaint #17 on the remaining Defendant; and (3) send Plaintiff filing instructions and a copy of this order. Because Plaintiff has paid the filing fee and is not proceeding in forma pauperis, he is not necessarily entitled to service at government expense. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Additionally, Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he cannot pay the required deposit to the U.S. Marshal. Plaintiff must either: (1) serve the Defendant himself; (2) retain a private process server to serve Defendant; or (3) employ the services of the U.S. Marshal to serve Defendant. The U.S. Marshal is directed to send Plaintiff the request for payment of the deposit to effectuate service (service costs generally range between $65.00 and $250.00 per location). If Plaintiff elects to employ the services of the U.S. Marshal, he must pay the required deposit by March 1, 2023; the U.S. Marshal will not take further action until the deposit has been paid. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-ofaddress notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. If Plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of his address, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with a Court order and for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is also directed to send a copy of this order and the USM 285 Form returned by Plaintiff 6 to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal is appointed to effect service (assuming Plaintiff chooses service via this option and pays the appropriate deposit) and is authorized to send a request for waiver of service in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) before attempting personal service. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation is #5 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/9/2023. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| FORWARDED copy of Order dated 1/9/23 w/USM-285 as to David Chadek to U.S. Marshal Office. (gcy, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued 1 Original and certified copy of Order dated 1/9/23 as to Defendant David Chadek to U.S. Marshal for service via email. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 19 MOTION by Plaintiff Richard J Vinet for extension. (Envelope postmark dated 1/3/23). (gcy, ) |
| Filing 17 COMPLAINT filed by Richard J Vinet; Jury Demand. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Status hearing previously set for 1/12/2023 is stricken. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: The Honorable Gary S. Feinerman will resign his Commission as a United States District Judge effective December 31, 2022. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED That the civil cases on the attached list are to be reassigned to the other judges of this Court as indicated, pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(f). IT IS ALSO ORDERED That any civil case that was assigned to the Honorable Gary S. Feinerman and may require further judicial action in the future, shall be reassigned by lot to a judge of this Court. Case reassigned to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo for all further proceedings. Honorable Gary Feinerman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 12/28/2022. (td, )
|
| Filing 13 MAIL RETURNED, for document #11 , #10 sent to Richard J. Vinet returned as undeliverable, return to sender. New address found, re-mailed to Stateville - STV P.O. Box 112, Joliet, IL 60434 (ak, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Richard J Vinet of Change of Address. (Envelope postmark 12/5/2022) (ph, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Status hearing set for 1/12/2023 at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: (877) 336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is directed to either (1) submit a renewed and complete application that is certified by a trust fund officer and that includes a copy of Plaintiff's trust fund statement showing all transactions in his account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of hiscomplaint; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. Failure to comply with this order by January 6, 2023, will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 11/22/2022. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| Filing 7 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Gary Feinerman for all further proceedings. Honorable Marvin E. Aspen no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/22/22.(gcy, ) |
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 11/22/22 with IFP Application to Richard Vinet. (gcy, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (cxr, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (cxr, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Richard J Vinet. (cxr, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Richard J Vinet for attorney representation (cxr, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Richard J Vinet for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachment). (cxr, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Richard J Vinet. (cxr, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (cxr, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 2 copies by Richard J Vinet (Envelope not postmarked). (cxr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
