National Examining Board of Ocularists v. Adkins
| National Examining Board of Ocularists |
| Patrick G. Adkins |
| 1:2022cv06550 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Service by TJ Jesky on behalf of National Examining Board of Ocularists regarding text entry, #17 (Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. (Dckt. No. #15 The Court reminds Defendant that a response is due by January 27, 2023, as this Court ordered on January 3, 2023. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order on Defendant and file a certificate of service. Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO RESCHEDULE MOTEN to enter time to anser complaint by Defendant Patrick G. Adkins. (aee, ) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Service by TJ Jesky on behalf of National Examining Board of Ocularists regarding MOTION by Plaintiff National Examining Board of Ocularists for default judgment as to Relief Requested #15 , notice of motion #14 (Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Plaintiff National Examining Board of Ocularists for default judgment as to Relief Requested (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by TJ Jesky for presentment of (Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Service by TJ Jesky on behalf of National Examining Board of Ocularists (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment (Dckt. No. #8 ). Defendant was served on November 23, 2022, and the answer was due by December 14, 2022. (Dckt. No. #3 ) Defendant has not responded to the complaint, and an answer is overdue. Default is a two-step process under the Federal Rules. The first step is the entry of default under Rule 55(a), and the second step is a default judgment under Rule 55(b). The motion at hand is a motion for a default judgment, so Plaintiff skipped a step. The Court treats the motion as a motion for the entry of default under Rule 55(a), which is granted. The Court orders the entry of default against Defendant Patrick Adkins under Rule 55(a). Plaintiff must file a separate motion for default judgment. That motion is due by January 17, 2023. The Court reminds Plaintiff of the obligation to specify and justify the requested relief, and provide a draft copy of a proposed judgment in Word to the proposed order inbox: proposed_order_seeger@ilnd.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff's current motion does not specify any requested relief, which is another reason to treat it as a motion for entry of default under Rule 55(a) instead of a motion for a default judgment under Rule 55(b). A response is due by January 27, 2023. Defendant must file a motion if he seeks a hearing on that motion. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this Order on Defendant and must file a certificate of service on the docket. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 11 ENTERED in Error Mailed notice(jjr, ) Modified on 1/3/2023 (jjr, ). |
| Filing 10 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by National Examining Board of Ocularists in support of motion for entry of default #8 judgment (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summons Returned Executed, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff National Examining Board of Ocularists for entry of default judgment (Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by TJ Jesky for presentment of (Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 6 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (aee, ) |
| Filing 5 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (Attachments: #1 Trademarks) (aee, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by February 14, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by National Examining Board of Ocularists as to Patrick G. Adkins on 11/23/2022, answer due 12/14/2022. (Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff National Examining Board of Ocularists by TJ Jesky (Jesky, TJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by National Examining Board of Ocularists; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20072178. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Registered Trademarks, #2 Exhibit Site Inspection Report, #3 Exhibit Forged Certificates, #4 Exhibit Letter, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Supplement Proposed Summons, #7 Appendix Reporton Filing of Trademark Action)(Jesky, TJ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mbh, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Patrick G. Adkins (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mbh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: National Examining Board of Ocularists v. Adkins | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: National Examining Board of Ocularists | |
| Represented By: | TJ Jesky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Patrick G. Adkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
