Harrison v. Young et al
Willie J Harrison |
Kim Young, Joanna Sted, McNally and Randy & all kitchen civilian staff |
1:2022cv06710 |
November 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Elaine E Bucklo |
Mary M Rowland |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Correction regarding #4 . (aee, ) |
MAILED Order dated 1/17/2023 and a blank amended complaint form, an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner version) to the plaintiff. (jh, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit without pre-paying the $402.00 filing fee or submitting an in forma pauperis application. If Plaintiff wants to pursue this lawsuit, he must either (1) pre-pay the $402.00 filing fee, or (2) seek leave to pay the filing fee in installments by submitting a properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Additionally, Plaintiff's complaint #1 and amended complaint #4 are stricken because they are unsigned. By March 7, 2023, Plaintiff must submit a signed amended complaint and comply with the filing-fee requirements. Failure to fully comply with this order will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank amended complaint form, an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (prisoner version), and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/17/2023. Mailed notice (jh, ) |
Filing 7 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Willie J Harrison (Exhibits). (Envelope not postmarked) (aee, ) |
Filing 4 Entered in Error. (aee, ) Modified on 1/20/2023 (aee, ). |
Filing 3 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Local Rule 40.3(b)(1). Case was assigned by lot to Judge Rowland in error. Plaintiff is an inmate who has filed a prior conditions of confinement case (04cv04701). Therefore, under the above-cited rule, this case should have been assigned directly to the calendar of Judge Bucklo who was assigned to his prior conditions of confinement case Case reassigned to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo for all further proceedings. Honorable Mary M. Rowland no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/2/22. (aee, ) |
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Willie J Harrison. (aee, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (aee, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and one copy by Willie J Harrison. (Envelope not postmarked) (aee, ) Modified on 12/2/2022 (aee, ). |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (aee, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.