Patel v. Mayorkas et al
| Bhikhabhai M Patel |
| Secretary of the DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, US Attorney General MERRICK B GARLAND, Director Terri A. Robinson, UR M JADDOU, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Terri A. Robinson and United States of America |
| 1:2022cv06816 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Terri A. Robinson, United States of America (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Terri A. Robinson, United States of America (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 4 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (jk2, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bhikhabhai M Patel by Brian Walsh Sather (Sather, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sather, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Bhikhabhai M Patel; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20107000. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A.USCIS Form I-797C notice of receipt of Plaintiff's I-130 visa petition for his child)(Sather, Brian) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kra, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
