Betney v. Cadence Education, LLC
Plaintiff: Chassidi Betney
Defendant: Cadence Education, LLC doing business as Cadence Academy Preschool
Case Number: 1:2022cv06832
Filed: December 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2023 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The parties shall exchange initial disclosures by 2/10/23 and all fact discovery must be noticed in time for completion by 8/25/23. The court will set expert discovery and dispositive motion deadlines when the parties get closer to completing fact discovery. An agreed proposed confidentiality order may be submitted to proposed_order_shah@ilnd.uscourts.gov. The parties may contact susan_mcclintic@ilnd.uscourts.gov for a settlement referral. Any requests to amend the pleadings must be made by 6/21/23. The parties shall file a status report on discovery progress on 6/21/23. Mailed notice (smm)
January 27, 2023 Filing 11 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Chassidi Betney (Eisenback, Chad)
January 24, 2023 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Cadence Education, LLC(Colvin, Jennifer)
January 4, 2023 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time to answer #8 is granted. Defendant's response to complaint is now due 1/24/23. The parties' initial status report is now due 1/27/23. Notices mailed. (psm, )
January 3, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Cadence Education, LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (UNOPPOSED) (Colvin, Jennifer)
January 3, 2023 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cadence Education, LLC by Jennifer L Colvin (Colvin, Jennifer)
December 29, 2022 Filing 6 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, )
December 14, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chassidi Betney as to Cadence Education, LLC on 12/13/2022, answer due 1/3/2023. (Volheim, Nathan)
December 12, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Cadence Education, LLC (ak, )
December 6, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chassidi Betney by Chad William Eisenback (Eisenback, Chad)
December 6, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chassidi Betney by Nathan Charles Volheim (Volheim, Nathan)
December 6, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Volheim, Nathan)
December 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Chassidi Betney; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20110042. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Volheim, Nathan)
December 6, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, )
December 6, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Betney v. Cadence Education, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chassidi Betney
Represented By: Chad William Eisenback
Represented By: Nathan Charles Volheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cadence Education, LLC doing business as Cadence Academy Preschool
Represented By: Jennifer L Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?