Minkus v. Signode Industrial Group LLC
| Sanford Minkus |
| SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC |
| 1:2022cv07023 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Young B Kim |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Young B. Kim on 2/10/2023. Mailed notice (ec)
|
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties' joint motion for entry of agreed confidentiality order #18 is granted. Enter Agreed Confidentiality Order. Mailed notice (ec) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Plaintiff Sanford Minkus for protective order (Joint) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order-Redline version, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order-Clean version)(Levin, David) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Signode Industrial Group LLC by Corinne T. Duffy (Duffy, Corinne) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties are ordered to adhere to the following written discovery schedule: (1) file motion for entry of agreed confidentiality order along with a proposed draft agreed order (a Word version of the draft order must also be emailed to "proposed_order_kim@ilnd.uscourts.gov") and serve written discovery requests by February 10, 2023 (requests to admit may be timely served before the end of fact discovery); (2) serve answers to written discovery requests by March 10, 2023; (3) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by March 24, 2023; and (4) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues (must identify the specific interrogatories and requests to produce), along with the relevant written discovery responses as exhibits, by March 31, 2023. The court will not consider general objections to written discovery requests if the court must address and rule on written discovery disputes. If the parties do not have any disputed written discovery issues, a status report is not required. Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 502(d), this court orders that inadvertent disclosures of attorney-client privileged and attorney work materials will not constitute a waiver of the associated privilege. The court further orders that upon written notification (including emails) from the opposing side that an inadvertent disclosure has occurred, the party shall return and/or destroy the materials at issue or file a motion for a determination on the claimed privilege within seven calendar days of the written notification. Mailed notice (ec) |
| Filing 15 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Young B. Kim for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision; settlement conference. (lf, )Notice mailed by Judge's staff. |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Based on the parties' joint initial status report, the Court sets the following deadlines in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3): initial disclosures shall be exchanged by 1/31/2023; any amended pleadings shall be filed by 4/1/2023; any motions to join other parties shall be filed by 4/1/2023; fact discovery shall be complete by 10/27/2023; and dispositive motions to be filed by 12/11/2023. Any motion to join and/or motion to amend pleadings after the above date will need to meet the good cause requirements of Fed.R. Civ. P. 16. This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for supervision of discovery and settlement, should the parties wish to schedule a settlement conference. The Magistrate Judge has authority to extend any deadlines contained in this order. The status hearing set for 1/31/2023 is stricken. The Court will monitor the docket and set further hearings as needed. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )
|
| Filing 13 STATUS Report Joint under Rule 26(f) by Sanford Minkus (Levin, David) |
| Filing 12 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Signode Industrial Group LLC (Aziere, Joel) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sanford Minkus as to Signode Industrial Group LLC on 12/20/2022, answer due 1/10/2023. (Levin, David) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: A telephonic status hearing is set for 1/31/23 at 9:30 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 1/26/23. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 888-808-6929 and the access code is 4911854. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, ) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Signode Industrial Group LLC(Aziere, Joel) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Signode Industrial Group LLC by Joel S. Aziere (Aziere, Joel) |
| Filing 7 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Andrew Aaron Brashler of Change of Address (Brashler, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by David B. Levin of Change of Address (Levin, David) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC (mbh, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sanford Minkus by Andrew Aaron Brashler (Brashler, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sanford Minkus by Todd M Friedman (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sanford Minkus by David B. Levin (Levin, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Sanford Minkus; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20139496. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Levin, David) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Minkus v. Signode Industrial Group LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sanford Minkus | |
| Represented By: | David B. Levin |
| Represented By: | Andrew Aaron Brashler |
| Represented By: | Todd M Friedman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SIGNODE INDUSTRIAL GROUP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joel S. Aziere |
| Represented By: | Corinne T. Duffy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
