Lehmann v. Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Plaintiff: Torrie Lehmann
Defendant: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. D/B/A ABBOTT NUTRITION and Abbott Laboratories Inc. doing business as Abbott Nutrition
Case Number: 1:2022cv07101
Filed: December 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Torrie Lehmann. Abbott Laboratories Inc. waiver sent on 12/27/2022, answer due 2/27/2023. (Sedgh, Jonathan)
December 28, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Torrie Lehmann by Jonathan Sedgh (Sedgh, Jonathan)
December 28, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Torrie Lehmann by Panagiotis V Albanis (Albanis, Panagiotis)
December 16, 2022 MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( Lehmann v. Abbott Laboratories Inc. / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Recalled Abbott Infant Formula Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3037 ). (aee, )
December 16, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Albanis, Panagiotis)
December 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Torrie Lehmann; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20149053.(Albanis, Panagiotis)
December 16, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jb, )
December 16, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K McShain. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lehmann v. Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Torrie Lehmann
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Represented By: Jonathan Sedgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. D/B/A ABBOTT NUTRITION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories Inc. doing business as Abbott Nutrition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?