Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Ashtel Studios, Inc. d/b/a SmartCare et al
Plaintiff: Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Defendant: Ashtel Studios, Inc. d/b/a SmartCare, Anish K. Patel and John Does 1-10
Case Number: 1:2022cv07184
Filed: December 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Steven C Seeger
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2022 Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Shulruff Dental, Inc. (Kolbus, Heather)
December 21, 2022 Filing 4 7.1 Disclosure STATEMENT by Shulruff Dental, Inc. (Kolbus, Heather)
December 21, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shulruff Dental, Inc. by Heather A. Kolbus (Kolbus, Heather)
December 21, 2022 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shulruff Dental, Inc. by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel)
December 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION filed by Shulruff Dental, Inc. ; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20163014. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Edelman, Daniel)
December 21, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mbh, )
December 21, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (mbh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shulruff Dental, Inc. v. Ashtel Studios, Inc. d/b/a SmartCare et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shulruff Dental, Inc.
Represented By: Heather A. Kolbus
Represented By: Daniel A. Edelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashtel Studios, Inc. d/b/a SmartCare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anish K. Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?