KRUCKOW v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: KENNETH KRUCKOW
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2023cv00003
Filed: January 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: M David Weisman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable M. David Weisman for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1. Parties have consented to the reassignment. Honorable John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/18/23.(gcy, )
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing of the joint consent to exercise of jurisdiction #7 , this case is transferred to the Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Any pending deadlines before Judge Blakey are stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Konoski, Bryan)
January 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Alex Harms Hartzler as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Hartzler, Alex)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Court's official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 2/17/2023, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at Gloria_Lewis@ilnd.uscourts.gov. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, )
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (smb, )
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable David M. Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )
January 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff KENNETH KRUCKOW by Bryan Konoski (Konoski, Bryan)
January 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION by Plaintiff KENNETH KRUCKOW for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Konoski, Bryan)
January 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by KENNETH KRUCKOW; (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Konoski, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KRUCKOW v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KENNETH KRUCKOW
Represented By: Bryan Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: Alex Harms Hartzler
Represented By: AUSA - SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?