Smith et al v. TikTok Inc. et al
| Cinnamon Smith, Alison Paige, Marrchelle Tanzymore and Carolyn Smith |
| TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00134 |
| January 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #15 , this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (cp, ) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 14 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that the Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer is presiding in MDL 2948 (20 CV 4699, In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation); therefore It is hereby ordered that the Clerk is to reassign the cases listed below to Judge Pallmeyer in MDL 2948 (20 CV 4699, In Re:Tiktok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation) and the designated Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani. Case reassigned to the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer for all further proceedings. Honorable Thomas M. Durkin no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 4/27/2023. (axk, ) Modified on 5/2/2023 (axk, ). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Errata by Roland Tellis (jn, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JPML RULING. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 1/31/2023. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Agreed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending JPML Ruling (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Machock, Samantha) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure STATEMENT by ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc. (Machock, Samantha) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc. by Samantha A. Machock (Machock, Samantha) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc. by Anthony J Weibell (Weibell, Anthony) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc. by Steven P. Mandell (Mandell, Steven) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cinnamon Smith, Carolyn Smith, Marrchelle Tanzymore, Alison Paige as to ByteDance Inc. on 1/18/2023, answer due 2/8/2023. (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cinnamon Smith, Carolyn Smith, Marrchelle Tanzymore, Alison Paige as to TikTok Inc. on 1/12/2023, answer due 2/2/2023. (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alison Paige, Carolyn Smith, Cinnamon Smith, Marrchelle Tanzymore by Gary M. Klinger (Klinger, Gary) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alison Paige, Carolyn Smith, Cinnamon Smith, Marrchelle Tanzymore by Jeffrey M. Ostrow (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 3/22/2023, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc. (mbh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Cinnamon Smith, Carolyn Smith, Marrchelle Tanzymore, Alison Paige; Yes. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BILNDC-20221417. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (sxh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
