Eskharya v. USCIS
Plaintiff: Maryam Eskharya and Maryam Shlaymoon Eskha Eskharya
Defendant: USCIS USCIS, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, USCIS and US Attorney
Case Number: 1:2023cv00205
Filed: January 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy L Maldonado
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services to remand Agreed (Oswald, Craig)
February 16, 2023 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: The Court has reviewed the joint status report #7 , which states the parties have not engaged in settlement discussions but Defendant is hopeful this case can be resolved without contested litigation. The parties expect that USCIS will be able to adjudicate the application within a reasonable period of time and the case will be voluntarily dismissed thereafter. In light of the parties' representations, the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to 4/13/23. By that same date, the parties shall file a joint status report updating the Court on the prospect of voluntary dismissal. Emailed notice. (cdh, )
February 15, 2023 Filing 7 STATUS Report Joint between the parties by Maryam Shlaymoon Eskha Eskharya (Michael, Alexander)
February 1, 2023 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants US Attorney, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Oswald, Craig)
January 24, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maryam Shlaymoon Eskha Eskharya as to US Attorney served on 1/19/2023, answer due 3/20/2023 (Michael, Alexander)
January 24, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maryam Shlaymoon Eskha Eskharya as to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 1/19/2023, answer due 3/20/2023 (Michael, Alexander)
January 17, 2023 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: By 2/15/2023, the parties shall file a joint Initial Status Report that complies with the Court's standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. (ca, )
January 13, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Michael, Alexander)
January 13, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Maryam Eskharya; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20234590.(Michael, Alexander)
January 13, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, )
January 13, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, )
January 13, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to USCIS, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (kra, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eskharya v. USCIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maryam Eskharya
Represented By: Alexander Albert Michael
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maryam Shlaymoon Eskha Eskharya
Represented By: Alexander Albert Michael
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS USCIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Attorney
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?