ZHENG v. COINMETRO GROUP OU et al
Plaintiff: CHUNHE ZHENG
Defendant: COINMETRO GROUP OU and KEVIN MURCKO
Case Number: 1:2023cv00233
Filed: January 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2023 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 10, and the Defendants' motion to dismiss, discovery shall be stayed until a decision on the motion to dismiss. The Plaintiff's response is due on 03/21/2023. The defense reply is due on 04/04/2023. The tracking status hearing of 03/03/2023 is reset to 05/26/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Mailed notice (cn).
February 23, 2023 Filing 10 STATUS Report Initial Joint by CHUNHE ZHENG (Pustilnik, David)
February 23, 2023 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CHUNHE ZHENG by David F Pustilnik (Pustilnik, David)
February 21, 2023 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM by COINMETRO GROUP OU, KEVIN MURCKO in support of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #7 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Schutte, Scott)
February 21, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION by Defendants KEVIN MURCKO, COINMETRO GROUP OU to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants KEVIN MURCKO, COINMETRO GROUP OU (Schutte, Scott)
January 25, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gcy, )
January 24, 2023 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Defendant's unopposed motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead #5 is granted to 02/19/2023. Initial tracking status hearing set for 03/03/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 02/23/2023. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (mw, )
January 17, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION by Defendants COINMETRO GROUP OU, KEVIN MURCKO for extension of time to file Response to Plaintiff's Complaint (Unopposed) (Schutte, Scott)
January 17, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, )
January 15, 2023 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by COINMETRO GROUP OU (Schutte, Scott)
January 15, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants COINMETRO GROUP OU, KEVIN MURCKO by Scott T. Schutte (Schutte, Scott)
January 15, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schutte, Scott)
January 15, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2022 L 003017) filed by COINMETRO GROUP OU, KEVIN MURCKO Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20238025. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Schutte, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ZHENG v. COINMETRO GROUP OU et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHUNHE ZHENG
Represented By: Christopher J. Esbrook
Represented By: David F Pustilnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COINMETRO GROUP OU
Represented By: Scott T. Schutte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEVIN MURCKO
Represented By: Scott T. Schutte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?