Jeff Bartels v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Plaintiff: Jeff Bartels
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Case Number: 1:2023cv00311
Filed: January 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Steven C Seeger
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2023 Filing 14 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Jeff Bartels regarding memorandum in support of motion, #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2-1, #2 Exhibit 2-2, #3 Exhibit 2-3, #4 Exhibit 2-4)(Vogt, Keith)
January 19, 2023 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in support of 12 Exparte motion (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Keith A. Vogt, #2 Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration, #3 Declaration of Jeff Bartels, #4 Exhibit 1, of Jeff Bartels' declaration)(Vogt, Keith)
January 19, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for leave to file excess pages (Vogt, Keith)
January 19, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for leave to file under seal (Vogt, Keith)
January 19, 2023 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by April 10, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
January 19, 2023 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre (Mcintyre, Cameron)
January 19, 2023 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam)
January 19, 2023 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi)
January 19, 2023 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling)
January 19, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Keith A. Vogt (Vogt, Keith)
January 19, 2023 Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Vogt, Keith)
January 19, 2023 Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels Schedule A to Complaint (1) (Vogt, Keith)
January 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jeff Bartels; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20252217. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Vogt, Keith)
January 19, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, )
January 19, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeff Bartels v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeff Bartels
Represented By: Adam Grodman
Represented By: Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
Represented By: Yanling Jiang
Represented By: Yi Bu
Represented By: Keith A. Vogt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?