Matthews v. Doe, et al
| Nathan Matthews |
| John Doe |
| 1:2023cv00455 |
| January 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Manish S Shah |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Certificate of Service by Nathan Matthews. (jj, )
|
|
Filing 11
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Nathan Matthews for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments) (jg, )
|
|
Filing 10
RECEIVED AMENDED complaint by Nathan Matthews (Envelope postmark 3/1/2023) (jg, )
|
|
Filing 9
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Nathan Matthews for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits) (Envelope post marked 2/28/2023) (rp, )
|
|
Filing 8
DECLARATION in support of motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments) (Envelope postmark 2/24/2023) (jg, )
|
|
Filing 7
MAILED a blank IFP application and a copy of order dated 2/8/2023 to Plaintiff. (jg, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 is denied, without prejudice. The Court directs Plaintiff to submit a renewed IFP application that is certified by a trust fund officer; he must also attach copies of jail or prison trust fund ledgers showing his income for the six months preceding the initiation of this action [that is, from July 25, 2022, through January 25, 2023]. Failure to comply March 1, 2023, will result in denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis and summary dismissal of this case. The Court instructs the Clerk to provide Plaintiff with a blank IFP application along with a copy of this order. The Court at this time defers ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Representation #4 . Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/8/2023. Mailed notice. (jg, )
|
|
Filing 5
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: IT APPEARING THAT, due to a clerical error the case 23cv455, Matthews v. Doe, et al, was directly assigned in error to the Honorable Manish S. Shah and Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani and classified in error as a 555 case, therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the assignment of case 23cv455, Matthews v. Doe, et al, shall be vacated and the case shall be randomly reassigned using Category 3 as the case is a 550 civil rights case. Case reassigned to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall and Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox for all further proceedings. Honorable Manish S. Shah no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 1/26/2023. (jg, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jg, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jg, )
|
|
MAILED copy of clerk's notice and consent form to Plaintiff. (jg, )
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Plaintiff Nathan Matthews for attorney representation (jg, )
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Nathan Matthews for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments) (jg, )
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (jg, )
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED COMPLAINT by Nathan Matthews; Jury Demand. (Attachments) (Envelope postmark 1/17/2023) (jg, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Matthews v. Doe, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nathan Matthews | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
