Ye v. Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A
| Liling Ye |
| INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS ON SCHEDULE A, KOLEOLL Store and SURPOUF Parts Store |
| 1:2023cv00554 |
| January 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/22/2023. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Plaintiff's renewed motion for entry of a preliminary injunction is granted #18 . Enter Preliminary Injunction Order. The Clerk is directed to unseal all documents that were previously filed under seal. Law Firm Getech Law LLC is ordered to add all defendant names listed in the Schedule A to the docket within three business days. Instructions can be found on the court's website located at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf. The preliminary injunction hearing set for 3/23/2023 is vacated. The case is set for a telephonic status hearing on 5/31/2023 at 9:05 AM. The following call-in number will be used for the hearing: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Plaintiff is directed to file a status report regarding service of process and settlement efforts on 5/24/2023. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
| NEW PARTIES: KOLEOLL Store and SURPOUF Parts Store added to case caption. (Lei, Ge) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Plaintiff Liling Ye for preliminary injunction (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Exhibit)(Lei, Ge) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction #16 is denied, without prejudice to prompt renewal. The motion and accompanying documents do not establish - as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(1) and this Court's order of 3/7/2023 - that the motion for preliminary injunction has been served upon all of the defendants sought to be enjoined. Rather, counsel's certificate of service appears to state that only the summons, complaint, and motion for TRO were served on all defendants and that the motion for preliminary injunction was served only upon one defendant that is represented by counsel. Plaintiff is reminded that the TRO expires in two days, so if it wishes to refile the motion for preliminary injunction it must do so (and comply with the Rules' and the Court's service requirements) promptly. (mk) |
| Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Liling Ye for preliminary injunction (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Exhibit)(Lei, Ge) |
| Filing 15 REGISTRY INFORMATION FORM by gE (Linda) Leiy. (daj, ) |
| BOND in the amount of $1000.00 cashier's check, Receipt No. 4624283514, posted by Liling Ye. (smb, ) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Liling Ye as to Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A on 3/7/2023, answer due 3/28/2023. (Lei, Ge) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Plaintiff's motion to extend the temporary restraining order #12 is granted; the temporary restraining order is extended through 3/23/2023. Telephonic preliminary injunction hearing is set for 3/23/2023 at 8:50 AM. The following call-in number will be used for the hearing: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Any motion for preliminary injunction must be filed by 3/29/2023. Any motion for preliminary injunction filed in this case must be accompanied by a certificate stating upon whom and how the motion has been served. (mk) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A (smb, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Liling Ye to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Declaration)(Lei, Ge) |
Filing 11
ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/23/2023. (mma, ) Modified on 3/23/2023 (rp, ).
|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Plaintiff's motion to file under seal is granted #6 . Plaintiff's motion for alternative service of process #5 is granted. Plaintiff's motion for entry of an ex parte temporary restraining order #4 is also granted. Enter Sealed Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order. Telephonic preliminary injunction hearing is set for 3/9/2023 at 8:50 AM. The following call-in number will be used for the hearing: 888-684-8852, access code 746-1053. Any motion for preliminary injunction or motion to extend the temporary restraining order must be filed by 3/6/2023. Any motion for preliminary injunction filed in this case must be accompanied by a certificate stating upon whom and how the motion has been served. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The plaintiff in this case filed a motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order on or about 1/30/2023. However, contrary to the requirements on the assigned judge's web page, the plaintiff does not appear to have provided a draft temporary restraining order (which must be in Word format and must include all attachments). The Court advises plaintiff that the motion for a TRO will be denied unless a draft order is provided to the assigned judge's proposed order e-mail address by no later than 2/22/2023. (mk) |
| Filing 8 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (jn, ) |
| Filing 7 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (jn, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Liling Ye to seal sealed document 2, SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order 4, and Sealed Motion by Plaintiff for Alternative Service 5 (Lei, Ge) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Liling Ye for alternative service (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Declaration)(Lei, Ge) Modified on 3/23/2023 (rp, ). |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Liling Ye for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Declaration, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit)(Lei, Ge) Modified on 3/23/2023 (rp, ). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lei, Ge) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT by Plaintiff Liling Ye Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Lei, Ge) Modified on 3/23/2023 (rp, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Liling Ye; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20295120. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Lei, Ge) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
