The Blue Note, Inc. v The City of Chicago et al
| THE BLUE NOTE, INC., d/b/a The Point, an Illinois Corporation and The Blue Note, Inc. an Illinois Corporation doing business as The Point |
| The City of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, The City of Chicago Department of Buildings, Matthew Beaudet, Chicago Police Department, David O. Brown and Flat Iron Building, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00648 |
| February 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Matthew Beaudet, David O. Brown, Chicago Police Department, The City of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, The City of Chicago Department of Buildings by Aaron Talen Dozeman (Dozeman, Aaron) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion to set briefing schedule, extend time to answer, and enlarge page limit #12 is granted. City Defendants' motion to dismiss is due by 4/21/2023. Plaintiff's opposition is due by 5/19/2023. City Defendants' reply is due by 6/2/2023. The page limit for briefs in support and opposition of the forthcoming motion to dismiss are not to exceed 30 pages. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendants Matthew Beaudet, David O. Brown, Chicago Police Department, The City of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, The City of Chicago Department of Buildings for extension of time to file answer , MOTION by Defendants Matthew Beaudet, David O. Brown, Chicago Police Department, The City of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, The City of Chicago Department of Buildings to set a briefing schedule , MOTION by Defendants Matthew Beaudet, David O. Brown, Chicago Police Department, The City of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, The City of Chicago Department of Buildings for leave to file excess pages (Unopposed) (Wilson, Bradley) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Matthew Beaudet, David O. Brown, Chicago Police Department, The City of Chicago, The City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, The City of Chicago Department of Buildings by Bradley Gordon Wilson (Wilson, Bradley) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by The Blue Note, Inc.. Flat Iron Building, LLC waiver sent on 2/3/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Fahner, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by The Blue Note, Inc.. The City of Chicago Department of Buildings waiver sent on 2/3/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Fahner, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by The Blue Note, Inc.. Chicago Police Department waiver sent on 2/3/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Fahner, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by The Blue Note, Inc.. The City of Chicago waiver sent on 2/3/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Fahner, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by The Blue Note, Inc.. David O. Brown waiver sent on 2/3/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Fahner, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by The Blue Note, Inc.. Matthew Beaudet waiver sent on 2/3/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Fahner, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by The Blue Note, Inc.. The City of Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection waiver sent on 2/3/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Fahner, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Blue Note, Inc. by Daniel T. Fahner (Fahner, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 4/14/2023, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by THE BLUE NOTE, INC., d/b/a The Point, an Illinois Corporation; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20312852. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Exhibit R, #20 Exhibit S, #21 Exhibit T, #22 Exhibit U, #23 Exhibit V, #24 Exhibit W, #25 Exhibit X, #26 Exhibit Y)(Fahner, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
