Hall et al v. Layma, LLC, et al
| Matthew Hall and Debbie Hall |
| Layma, LLC, also known as Layama, LLC, and doing business as Little Lake Lending, Layama, LLC, and doing business as Little Lake Lending, Ben G. Ray, III, John Does 1-20, Layma, LLC also known as Layama, LLC doing business as Little Lake Lending and Layama, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00929 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan B Gottschall |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: An initial status report and, if appropriate, case management plan is due on or before April 19, 2023. In conformity with General Order 21-0027 and due to the need for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court is ordering written status reports instead of routine oral status hearings. This includes initial status hearings and scheduling conferences under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). See Judge Gottschall's website for the procedure for requesting a hearing and for requirements for status reports and discovery plans during the COVID-19 pandemic. No Rule 26(f) discovery plan should be submitted until all parties have appeared or been served. If all parties have not appeared or been served by the deadline for filing an initial status report, the report should so state and propose a deadline for filing a discovery plan. The parties are directed to discuss settlement and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. They are further directed to meet and confer regarding a proposed discovery plan. See Judge Gottschall's civil case management packet regarding pretrial case management procedures at: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 2/17/2023. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Layma, LLC, Ben G. Ray, III (jb, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Debbie Hall, Matthew Hall by Matthew J. Goldstein (Goldstein, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Debbie Hall, Matthew Hall by Dulijaza Clark (Clark, Dulijaza) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Debbie Hall, Matthew Hall by Tara Leigh Goodwin (Goodwin, Tara) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Debbie Hall, Matthew Hall by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION filed by Matthew Hall, Debbie Hall; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20350398. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Edelman, Daniel) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
