Shine v. Kendall, Secretary of the U.S. Air Force
Plaintiff: Patrick Shine
Defendant: Frank Kendall, Secretary of the U.S. Air Force
Case Number: 1:2023cv00957
Filed: February 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Franklin U Valderrama
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2023 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time #12 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before 5/9/2023. Emailed notice (axc).
April 12, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Frank Kendall, Secretary of the U.S. Air Force for extension of time to file answer Unopposed (Allison, Eric)
March 17, 2023 Filing 11 DECLARATION of Christopher R. Murphy Declaration of Christopher R. Murphy Regarding Compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Certified Mail to Frank Kendall, #2 Exhibit UPS Certified Mail to The Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice, #3 Exhibit USPS Certified Mail to the Air Force Review Boards Agency, Attn: Discharge Review Board, #4 Exhibit USPS Certified Mail to the Air Force)(Murphy, Christopher)
March 1, 2023 Filing 10 DESIGNATION of Eric Dean Allison as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Frank Kendall, Secretary of the U.S. Air Force (Allison, Eric)
February 24, 2023 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 05/02/2023 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Emailed notice (axc).
February 21, 2023 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Affidavit of Special Process Server regarding summons issued (McCarthy, Chelsea)
February 16, 2023 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Patrick Shine by Tahany Mohammed Alsabahi (Alsabahi, Tahany)
February 16, 2023 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Patrick Shine by Robert David Donoghue (Donoghue, Robert)
February 16, 2023 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Patrick Shine by Christopher R Murphy (Murphy, Christopher)
February 16, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Patrick Shine by Richard R. Winter (Winter, Richard)
February 16, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Patrick Shine by Chelsea Ashbrook McCarthy (McCarthy, Chelsea)
February 16, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (McCarthy, Chelsea)
February 16, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Patrick Shine; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20354113. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint)(McCarthy, Chelsea)
February 16, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, )
February 16, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, )
February 16, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Frank Kendall, Secretary of the U.S. Air Force (khg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shine v. Kendall, Secretary of the U.S. Air Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Shine
Represented By: Christopher R Murphy
Represented By: Richard R. Winter
Represented By: Robert David Donoghue
Represented By: Tahany Mohammed Alsabahi
Represented By: Chelsea Ashbrook McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Kendall, Secretary of the U.S. Air Force
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Eric Dean Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?