Clements v. Zip-Pak
| Eric Clements |
| Zip-Pak |
| 1:2023cv01066 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Eric Clements. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Motion hearing held on 3/13/2023. Plaintiff's application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court will further review plaintiff's complaint to see if has basis to proceed further. Plaintiff is referred to make an appointment with the Hibbler Help Desk by emailing at hibbler@legalaidchicago.org or calling 312-435-5691. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Presentment of plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 and motion for attorney representation #4 is set for 3/13/2023 at 10:45 AM as an in-person hearing in courtroom 1241. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Eric Clements (kl, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Eric Clements for attorney representation (Attachment) (kl, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Eric Clements for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments) (kl, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (kl, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Eric Clements (Attachments) (kl, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kl, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kl, ) |
| MAILED Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Eric Clements (kl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clements v. Zip-Pak | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric Clements | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zip-Pak | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
