Lehr et al v. Ascension Health
| Desiree Lehr, Amanda Woolcock, Jennifer Kochniarczyk and Erin Lindy |
| Ascension Health, a Missouri Non-profit Corporation and Ascension Health |
| 1:2023cv01080 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM by Ascension Health in support of motion to dismiss #13 Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Dishman, Neil) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Ascension Health to dismiss Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Dishman, Neil) |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Defendant Ascension Health for leave to file excess pages Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Memorandum in Excess of 15 Pages Instanter (Dishman, Neil) |
| Filing 11 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT UNDER RULE 26(f) by Ascension Health (Dishman, Neil) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for extension of time to answer #9 is granted. Defendant must answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiffs' complaint on or before 4/21/2023. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Ascension Health for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 DEFENDANT ASCENSION HEALTH'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (Dishman, Neil) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ascension Health by Anderson Charles Franklin (Franklin, Anderson) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ascension Health by Neil Hunter Dishman (Dishman, Neil) |
Filing 6
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 3/15/2023: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 5/1/2023 at 9:30 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice (ef, )
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Kochniarczyk, Amanda Woolcock, Desiree Lehr, Erin Lindy as to Ascension Health on 3/10/2023, answer due 3/31/2023. (Bloom, Willem) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Ascension Health (smb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as the Honorable Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) (Text Modified on 2/24/2023 to reflect correct Magistrate Judge) (tg, ). |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Plaintiffs Jennifer Kochniarczyk, Desiree Lehr, Erin Lindy, Amanda Woolcock . (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Docket Text modified by Clerk's Office). Modified on 2/23/2023 (jj, ). |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Plaintiffs Jennifer Kochniarczyk, Desiree Lehr, Erin Lindy, Amanda Woolcock . (Bloom, Willem). (Docket Text modified by Clerk's Office). Modified on 2/23/2023 (jj, ). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bloom, Willem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jennifer Kochniarczyk, Amanda Woolcock, Desiree Lehr, Erin Lindy; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20369931.(Bloom, Willem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
