R. v. Finkelstein
| Z. R. |
| Samuel Finkelstein |
| 1:2023cv01146 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable John Robert Blakey for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 40.4. Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/30/2023. (kl, ) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Samuel Finkelstein. Samuel Finkelstein waiver sent on 2/24/2023, answer due 4/25/2023. (Slade, Randall) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Samuel Finkelstein by Randall W Slade (Slade, Randall) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons listed in the motion, Plaintiff a minor child, motion to proceed under pseudonym #2 , is granted. Additionally, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's motion for reassignment based on relatedness #6 . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) and Local Rule 40.4, Plaintiff appears to move for reassignment of this case, Z.R. v. Samuel Finkelstein, No. 23-cv-01146, to the Court in in Z.R. v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, et al., No. 19-cv-4115 because it is related to the common operative facts currently pending before that Court. L.R. 40.4(c) provides that a motion to reassign a case "shall be filed in the lowest-numbered case of the claimed related set and noticed before the judge assigned to that case." Thus, the motion for reassignment should have been filed in 19-cv-4115 as it is the lower numbered case. As such, the Court denies the motion to reassign #6 . Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by James Charles Pullos for presentment of motion to reassign case #6 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 3/8/2023 at 11:00 AM. (Pullos, James) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Z. R. to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion for Reassignment Based on Relatedness (Pullos, James) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 05/10/2023 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Pullos, James) |
| Filing 3 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Z. R. EX. A to Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym (Pullos, James) |
| Filing 2 MOTION by Plaintiff Z. R.Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Pullos, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Z. R.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20378995. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pullos, James) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ak, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: R. v. Finkelstein | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Z. R. | |
| Represented By: | James Charles Pullos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Samuel Finkelstein | |
| Represented By: | Randall W Slade |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
